RUPAN DEOL BAJAJ
Pritam Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Tehsildar Sales Abohar – Respondent
Rupan Deol Bajaj, FC. - An application has been moved by Shri Harbir Singh Aulakh, POA holder of Smt. Pritam Kaur, on 17.1.2005, wherein he has stated that Smt. Pritam Kaur, his mother, was allotted land in excess of her entitlement and subsequently the excess land in the hands of Pritam Kaur was allotted to N.C. Sippy and K.R. Sippy, who further sold it to Shri Harjit Singh, IAS, then posted as SDM Abohar and others. It has been further stated that Smt. Pritam Kaur challenged the allotment to Sippy brothers and ultimately the Honble Supreme Court of India cancelled the allotment in the name of Sippy brothers and ownership of the subsequent purchasers. The Honble Supreme Court also directed that under Rule 62 of the Displaced Persons Compensation & Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 the first right to purchase the land vests in Pritam Kaur. The applicant further pleaded that although Honble Supreme Court passed the order in 1996, the authorities below i.e. Managing Officer, Sales Commissioner and Chief Sales Commissioner have not given any relief to Pritam Kaur on account of interference of Shri Harjit Singh being an IAS Officer and tampering with the Revenue records without fear of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.