SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(P&H) 1487

VIRENDER SINGH
Darshan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. A.S. Jattana, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Singla, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Ms. B.K. Mann, Senior DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Virender Singh, J. - Darshan Singh, the appellant herein, was convicted by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ropar vide judgment dated 16.4.1990 under Sections 325/324/323/34 Indian Penal Code for having caused injuries to Bhupinder Kaur. The maximum sentence awarded to the appellant was two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-. An appeal was then preferred and the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ropar, vide impugned judgment dated 15.7.1991 released the appellant under Section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on his entering into a probation bond for a period of two years with one surety in the like amount. He was also ordered to pay Rs. 5,000/- as compensation to injured Bhupinder Kaur. The fine already paid has been converted into litigation/cost of the proceedings. It was then directed by the lower Appellate Court that the appeal shall be dismissed in toto in case the compensation was not deposited within one week. Aggrieved by the impugned judgment, the appellant has preferred the present appeal.

2. I have heard Mr. A.S. Jattana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant as proxy counsel for Mr. S.K.




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top