ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
R. K. Thukral – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. - Heard.
Offence alleged agaisnt the petitioner is under section 7 of the Essential Commodities, Act, 1955 read with Clause 19 of Fertilizer Control Order, 1985.
2. Case of the prosecution is that a sample of fertilizer was taken which was manufactured by the company represented by the respondent and the same was found to be deficient. It is stated in the petition that custodial interrogation of the petitioner will not serve any purpose.
3. Without expressing any final opinion on the merits of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of investigation or three months whichever is later during which the petitioner will be free to apply for regular bail to the concerned court in accordance with law. If bail is declined, the petitioner will be given two weeks time to apply for bail in this Court.
4. In the event of arrest, petitioner will be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the conditions that the petitioner will not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.