SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 325

K.S.GAREWAL
Subash – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mrs. Sarla Chaudhary, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sandeep, AAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

K.S. Garewal, J. - Subhash has filed this application under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code seeking grant of parole under Section 3(1)(d) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners Temporary Release Act of 1988. Parole has been sought to conduct repairs of his house and the period for which parole is sought is four weeks. Petitioners case had been initiated by the Authorities on November 20, 2003. According to the petitioner, he is permanent resident of Pabra where he owns a house. The condition of the house is very bad and there are minor children at home. There is no other person present at home to repair the house. Petitioners father is also in jail. The above facts have been certified as correct by the Gram Panchayat.

2. Notice of motion was issued to the State and reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents by Jagjit Singh, Superintendent Central Jail, Hisar who has stated that the District Magistrate, Hisar did not recommend parole on the ground that the convict was undergoing imprisonment in a case of social evil. Reliance was placed on the report of the District Magistrate, Hisar Annexures R/T-I. This report was accepted by the Director General of Prisons Harya







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top