Mehinder Singh Sullar, J. (Oral) - The matrix of the facts, culminating in the commencement, relevant for the limited purpose of deciding the core controversy, involved in the instant petition and emanating from the record, is that petitioners Dr. Onkar Chander Jagpal and his wife Smt. Adarsh Jagpal claimed that they are residing in house, bearing No. 1318, Sector 15-B, Chandigarh for the last about 35 years. Complainant Sohini Chaudhary respondent No. 2 (for brevity "the complainant"), daughter of Ram Lubhaya Chaudhary, desired to purchase the said house from the very beginning. Since the petitioners have purchased 50% share of the house in question from Natinder Dhillon, so, the complainant and her other family members became inimical and started harassing them on false and frivolous grounds.

2. Having purchased the half of the portion of the indicated house petitioner No. 1 Dr. Onkar Chander Jagpal filed an application against Smt. Santosh Chaudhary wife of Ram Lubhaya (mother of the complainant), Smt. Sushil wife of H.S. Dhillon and Smt. Kamlesh wife of Sohan Lal under Section 12 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Extension to Chandigarh), Act, 1974, which was a