SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 829

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
V.M. Jain, J.
Jatinder Parshad - Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab - Respondent
Crl. Misc. No. 24122-M of 2000.
Decided On : 31 July, 2000

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. G.S. Gill, DAG., Punjab.

The requirement for cash security as a condition for bail should be justified by evidence of prior misuse of bail.

Headnote:

Bail - Modification of Bail Order - Cash Security

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an accused in a case under Sections 420/120-B Indian Penal Code, sought modification of the bail order requiring him to deposit Rs. 25,000 as cash security.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was no evidence to justify the requirement for the petitioner to deposit cash security, especially as there was no indication of prior misuse of bail.

Issues: The issue was whether the requirement for the petitioner to deposit cash security was justified in the absence of evidence of prior misuse of bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in the absence of evidence of prior misuse of bail, there was no justification for imposing the cash security requirement.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and modified the bail order, directing the petitioner to furnish bail bond with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000 each.

ORDER

V.M. Jain, J. - Heard.

The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 420/120-B Indian Penal Code. He was arrested. He applied for bail. He was ordered to be released on bail by the Additional Sessions Judge on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Ilaqa/ Duty Magistrate, subject to deposit of Rs. 25,000/- in the Court of Ilaqa Magistrate as security of his personal bond. Unable to deposit the amount of Rs. 25,000/- the petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, seeking modification of the order dated 7.6.2000 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, while ordering his relese on bail.

2. After hearing the ld. counsel for the parties and after perusing the record, I am of the opinion, that no case was made out for directing the petitioner to deposit Rs. 25,000/- as cash security, especially when there is nothing on the record to show that the petitioner at any point of time was earlier released on bail or that he had misused the concession of bail.

3. For the reasons recorded above, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 7.6.2000 passed by the ld. Sessions Judge ordering the release of the petitioner on bail is modified and it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Ilaqa Magistrate.

4. Copy of the order be given dasti, on payment.

Petition allowed.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top