SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 829

V.M.JAIN
Jatinder Parshad – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. G.S. Gill, DAG., Punjab.

ORDER

V.M. Jain, J. - Heard.

The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 420/120-B Indian Penal Code. He was arrested. He applied for bail. He was ordered to be released on bail by the Additional Sessions Judge on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Ilaqa/ Duty Magistrate, subject to deposit of Rs. 25,000/- in the Court of Ilaqa Magistrate as security of his personal bond. Unable to deposit the amount of Rs. 25,000/- the petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, seeking modification of the order dated 7.6.2000 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, while ordering his relese on bail.

2. After hearing the ld. counsel for the parties and after perusing the record, I am of the opinion, that no case was made out for directing the petitioner to deposit Rs. 25,000/- as cash security, especially when there is nothing on the record to show that the petitioner at any point of time was earlier released on bail or that he had misused the concession of bail.

3. For the reasons recorded above, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 7.6.2000 passed by the ld.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top