SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(P&H) 627

BAKHSHISH KAUR
Ram Dia – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: None
For the Respondent: Ms. Geeta Mutharia, AAG, Haryana

JUDGMENT

Bakhshish Kaur, J. (Oral) - The challenge in this petition is to the impugned order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, who had quashed the proceedings initiated under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The facts of this case are that Ram Dia (now petitioner) moved an application on 3.11.1976 for initiating the proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The application was dismissed as he was not found in possession, therefore, he went in revision, which was accepted and the case was remanded by the then learned Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra on 9.8.1980. On enquiry made by Shri Raj Kumar, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Nathi Ram (now respondent No. 2) was found to be in possession and again the order dated 23.3.1981 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate was challenged and the Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra remanded the case vide order dated 23.10.1981. The order dated 14.6.1985 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate after the remand was challenged in a revision under section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the proceedings were quashed.

3. I have heard Ms. Geeta Mutharia, AAG, Haryana. None has app











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top