SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 1468

K.K.SRIVASTAVA
Jagtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Harbhajan Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. S.S. Randhawa, DAG, Punjab.

ORDER

K.K. Srivastava, J. (Oral) - The petitioner seeks issuance of a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to register a cause against respondents 4 to 6 in respect of an occurrence reported to respondent No. 3, the Station House Officer, wherein the commission of cognizable offences is said to have been disclosed. An application was made before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, respondent No. 2, a copy of which has been placed on record wherein it was alleged that the Station House Officer, Police Station Sunam, District Sangrur was not taking any interest in this matter because of his alleged complicity with the accused persons. Representation, copy Annexure P4, is the first complaint in writing made by the petitioner before the Senior Superintendent of Police Sangrur. Since no action was taken by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, the petitioner approached this Court.

2. Notice of motion was issued to respondent No. 3 in the first instance and a reply was filed on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 by Jasdev Singh Sindhu, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sunam. It was alleged in para 2 of the reply, inter alia, as under :- "On an application submitted by Jagtar




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top