SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1390

R.L.ANAND
Sher Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kewal Krishan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:L.N. Verma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

R.L. Anand, J. - Unsuccessful plaintiff Sher Singh son of Jaimal Singh has filed the present R.S.A. and it has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 7.12.1983 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Sirsa, who set aside the judgment and decree dated 9.6.1982 passed by the Court of Sub Judge 3rd Class, Sirsa, who decreed the suit of the plaintiff- Sher Singh for possession by way of pre-emption against the defendant Kewal Krishan son of Sobh Raj, now respondent in this Court.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Sher Singh son of Jaimal Singh filed a suit for possession by way of pre-emption against Kewal Krishan son of Sobh Raj, claiming possession through pre-emption of the suit land measuring 7 kanals 16 marlas comprised in Rectangle No. 233 Killa No. 18 (5 Kanals 7 Marlas) and Killa No. 23/1 (2 Kanals 9 Marlas) and the case set up by the plaintiff was that Hari Singh son of Naunit Rai sold away 36 Kanals 18 Marlas of agricultural land, including the land in dispute, to Kewal Krishan son of Sobh Raj defendant for a sum of Rs. 91,000/- through registered sale deed dated 18.4.1978. The plaintiff Sher Singh claims that he is the tenant at will on payme































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top