SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 1635

N.C.JAIN, IQBAL SINGH
Sukhwinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Amir Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Amit Rawal, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. S.S. Aulakh, Advocate.

ORDER

Iqbal Singh, JJ. - The question involved being short one, the appeal is being disposed of at the stage of motion hearing.

2. The appellants-claimants by way of filing a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, claimed a sum of Rs. 8 lacs by way of compensation for the death of Randhir Singh, husband of appellant No. 1 and father of appellant No. 2. The appellants have been granted compensation in the sum of Rs. 1,50,000/-. The finding of negligence has become final and even otherwise the same is borne out from the evidence brought on the record of the case. The only question which remains to be decided is whether the Tribunal has granted reasonable and just compensation and if not whether the same deserves to be enhanced or not ? After reading the findings recorded by the Tribunal and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that the compensation amount needs enhancement of Rs. 66,000/-.

3. It has been found by the Tribunal that the deceased was of the age of 33 years. The dependency of the claimants has been held to be 2/3rd. The income of deceased was found at Rs. 1,500/- per month. The Tribunal has given multiplier of 15. In view of


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top