SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 632

R.S.MONGIA, M.L.KOUL
Pritam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harbhajan Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. K.S. Sidhu, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Viney Mittal, Advocate.

ORDER

R.S. Mongia, J. - The appellant, Pritam Singh, was married to the respondent, Harbhajan Kaur, on June 20, 1982. As per the averments, the marriage was never consummated and, therefore, there is no issue out of the wed-lock. In fact according to the appellant, respondent never came to the matrimonial home and from day one after the marriage, she had stayed with her parents.

2. A petition was filed by the appellant under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act (in short the Act) for the annulment of his marriage with respondent Harbhajan Kaur on various grounds. However, that petition was dismissed by the trial Court on October 7, 1995. The present appeal was filed against that judgment. During the pendency of the appeal, parties moved a miscellaneous application on September 12, 1996, being C.M. No. 10048-CII of 1996 to allow the amendment of the petition under Section 12 of the Act to convert the same under Section 13-B of the Act for the grant of decree of divorce by mutual consent. That application was allowed on September 13, 1996 and amended petition under Section 13-B of the Act supported by affidavits of the parties was taken on record.

3. Today, statements of the parties w


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top