SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(P&H) 835

BAKHSHISH KAUR
Dharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. I.P.S. Sidhu, AAG Punjab.

ORDER

Bakhshish Kaur, J - The petitioners were convicted and sentenced to under go imprisonment on various counts under sections 326/325/324/323/148/149 of Indian Penal Code by the trial court. Their conviction and sentence was maintained by the Appellate Court.

2. Nothing is being said with regard to the conviction of the petitioners. Otherwise also, the courts below have, on the perusal of the evidence, come to the concurrent finding, which is well-reasoned that the petitioners have caused injuries to the complainant-party.

3. The occurrence took place on October 13, 1987 i.e. nearly 12 years back. The petitioners have already undergone the travail and agony of protracted trial. Thus, interest of justice would be met if the sentence awarded to them is reduced to the already undergone by them. With this modification in the sentence, the revision stands disposed of.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top