SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(P&H) 1063

MEHTAB S.GILL
Behari Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of (U. T) Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ajay Lamba, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mehtab S. Gill, J. - Through this Criminal Revision, the petitioner calls in question the judgment/order dated October 23, 1986 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh whereby he was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 7 read with Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and sentenced to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of a payment of fine, to further undergo three months rigorous imprisonment. The appeal filed by the accused-petitioner against his conviction and sentence did not meet with any success.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that on 28.2.1984, Shri M.K. Sharma, Government Food Inspector, P.W. 1 inspected the shop of accused in Sector 14, Chandigarh and found the accused in possession of 10 kilograms of cows milk for sale. After doing the necessary formalities, sample of milk was taken and the Public Analyst vide report Exhibit PD found the same to be adulterated. On the application of the accused, another sample bottle was sent to the Director, Central Food Laboratory, Chandigarh who vide his certificate Exhibit PF also found the same to be adulterate
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top