SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(P&H) 1410

N.C.KHICHI
Sugar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Baldev Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ramesh Chahal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mrs. Anju Arora, AAG, Haryana.

ORDER

N.C. Khichi, J. - Heard.

The appellants, mentioned above, have already undergone more than three years of sentence. Appeal is not likely to be heard at the earliest.

2. In view of the observations made by the Honble Supreme Court in 1999 SCC (Crl.) 553, Bhagwan Rama Shinde Gosai and others v. State of Gujarat, remaining sentence awarded to the appellants shall remain suspended during the pendency of the appeal on furnishing their bail bond to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Faridabad.

Appeal allowed.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top