R.L. Anand, J. (Oral) - This is a criminal revision and has been directed against the judgment dated 1.12.1984, passed by the JMIC, Jagadhri, who dismissed the complaint of the petitioner under Section 120-A/120-B/468, Indian Penal Code, by holding that the Court was not competent to take cognizance of the commission of the present type of offence except on a complaint by the Court in which forgery has been allegedly committed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Paras Ram, father of the complainant Panni died about 40 years back before the institution of the present complaint. His widow Attari performed Karewa with one Surta who had gifted about 20 bighas of land and a house in her favour. Panni, complainant, is son of Attari from her first husband. Surta died on 2.7.1976, leaving behind Attari as his heir. It is alleged by the complainant that about 10/15 days of the death of Surta, the respondents entered into a criminal conspiracy to forge a will and an adoption deed. The respondents conspired that a document be prepared showing that Rameshwar, accused No. 2, had been adopted by Surta before his death and he also executed a will in favour of some of the respondents