SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 1155

HEMANT GUPTA, A.N.JINDAL
Hem Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
D.S.Brar, B.S.Sodhi, Rahul Rathore, Pradeep Singh Poonia

JUDGMENT

A.N.JINDAL, J.

(1) THIS order shall dispose of Criminal Appeal No. 661-DB of 2002 and Criminal Revision No.23 of 2003, as common questions of law and fact are involved in both the cases. For reference, facts are taken from Criminal Appeal No. 661-DB of 2002.

(2) ON the wee hours of 01.05.1999, accused Hem Raj, Randhir Singh (both deceased), Jangli, Ram Singh, Joginder and Dharampal are alleged to have waylaid Maman (deceased) and Rajma and caused vital injuries to them, as a result of which, Maman died. Therefore, all the accused were tried. However, vide judgment dated 07/ 10.08.2002, all of them, except Ram Singly were convicted and sentenced as under Under Section 302/149 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.l,000/-each. Under Section 326/149 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-each. Under Section 324/149 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-each. Under Section 323/149 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-each. Under Section 148 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-each. Hem Raj and Randhir Singh-accused are reported to


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top