SABINA
Girish – Appellant
Versus
Poonam – Respondent
Mrs. Sabina, J.: - Petitioners have preferred this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of criminal complaint along with Form-I under Section 12 of the protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short the Act) (Annexure P-6) as well as notice issued under Section 12 of the Act and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners were not residing in the matrimonial home of the respondent. Hence, the petitioners could not be prosecuted qua commission of offence punishable under the Act.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand, has opposed the petition but has failed to controvert the factual aspect of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner to the effect that the petitioners were not residing in the matrimonial home of the respondent.
4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the present petition deserves to be allowed.
5. Respondent has filed the complaint under the Act. Admittedly, petitioners are not residing in the matrimonial home of the respondent. Petitioner No.1 Girish
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.