SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(P&H) 1210

JASWANT SINGH, M.M KUMAR
A. P. RAHEJA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Suvir Sehgal - Petitioners.
Ms. Ritu Bahri - Respondents.

JUDGMENT

M.M. KUMAR, J. - Shri Rajiv Raheja - petitioner No. 2 is a former director of M/s. V.P. Engineering Service P. Ltd., Karnal (for brevity, "the company") whereas Shri A. P. Raheja - petitioner No. 1 is his attorney. The respondent Department served notices on petitioner No. 1 being the attorney of petitioner No. 2 to effect the recovery of sales tax amounting to Rs. 90,000, in respect of assessment year 1981-82 on the ground that petitioner No. 2 had been a director of the company. The notices were duly replied by petitioner No. 1 on November 2, 1987 (petitioners Nos. 3 and 4). He also filed an affidavit stating that petitioner No. 2 is the son of petitioner No. 1 and he is settled in U.K. and he had resigned as a director of the company on November 21, 1983 (petitioner No. 5). It has further been asserted in the petition that the letter of resignation was forwarded to the Registrar of Companies on December 20, 1983, on a prescribed form (petitioner No. 2). The prayer made by the petitioner is that no recovery from a former director of the company could be effected because the company is a separate entity and the assessment has been made against the company and not against








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top