SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(P&H) 3

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, V.RAMASWAMI, K.SUBBA RAO, J.C.SHAH, S.M.SIKRI
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Surjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Bishan Narain, Senior Advocate, (Mr. R. N. Sachthey, (Advocate, with him), for Appellant;
M/s. Nuruddin Ahmad, Anil Kumar, Sablok and R. B. Datar, Advocates, for Respondent No. 1;
Mr. S. V. Gupte, Solicitor-General of India (Mr. A. G. Pudissery, Advocate, with him), for Advocate-General for the State of Kerala;
M/s. R. H. Dhebar and S. P. Nayyar, Advocates, for Advocate-General for the State of Gujarat;
Mr. O. P. Rana, Advocate, for Advocate-General for the State of Uttar Pradesh;
Mr. Naunit Lal, Advocate, for Advocate-General for the State of Assam;
Mr. A.V. Rangam, Advocate, for Advocate-General for the State of Madras.

Judgement

VAIDIALINGAM, J. :

The question that arises for consideration, in this criminal appeal, by special leave, is regarding the right of a Public Prosecutor to file an application, under S. 494 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter called the Code), in respect of a complaint, filed by a private party, and which was being prosecuted by him as such.

2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are, briefly, as follows. Harnek Singh lodged a complaint at the Police Station, Phul, on October 15, 1964, at about 10-40 p.m., that while coming out of a picture house, along with Surjit Singh, first respondent herein, his foot accidentally struck against a third party, Avtar Singh, who was also corning out of the picture house along with Raj Pal, the second respondent. According to the complaint Avtar Singh and the second respondent picked up a quarrel with Harnek Singh, but they were pacified and separated by the Manager of the cinema who intervened. It is also alleged that when later, Harnek Singh and the first respondent were near the Civil Hospital, Phul, the second respondent fired a shot at Harnek Singh. The Police appears to have investigated this complaint and took the view tha












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top