IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
[DIVISION BENCH]
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
C.W.P. No.16227 of 2009
Amritpal Singh
v.
Chandigarh Administration & Ors.
{Decided on 10/05/2012}
There is no Rule/Clause which empowers the Administration to seek 'No Objection Certificate' from its transferees, when the title and interest in the land or the building stands transferred without any encumbrance on receipt of the entire sale consideration--Even the model deed of conveyance contained in Form 'B' in the 1960 Rules, has no clause, which require 'No Objection Certificate' from the Chandigarh Administration. (Para 18)
(B) Chandigarh (Sale of Sites and Building) Rules, 1960--Requirement of 'No Objection Certificate before effecting sale of free hold properties not legal--Directions to Registering Authorities issued--Capital of Punjab (Development) and Regulation Act, 1952.
(i) That the requirement of 'No Objection Certificate' from the Chandigarh Administration before effecting sale of the free hold properties is not supported by the Act or the Rules framed thereunder.
(ii) The Registering Authority is duty bound to examine; whether the Power of Attorneys are being executed for consideration--If the Authorities are satisfied that it is for consideration, the Power of Attorney shall not be registered unless the proper stamp duty is affixed thereon.
(iii) If the proper stamp duty is not paid on a Power of Attorney executed on and after 15.11.2007, the Registering Authority shall refuse to register the document on the basis of such attorney at any subsequent stage unless proper stamp duty is affixed thereon in accordance with law.
(iv) The Chandigarh Administration may re-examine Rule 17(10) of the 1973 Rules contemplating unearned increase, as well the restriction to sell the properties before the expiry of specific years, as the root-cause of malice of Power of Attorneys sales.
(v) The Chandigarh Administration to frame Rules to maintain and update the property records in the manner mutations are sanctioned in respect of non urban properties under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 or such other procedure, which is fair, reasonable and transparent. (Para 32)
(C) Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952--Sale through power of attorney--Validity of--There may be cases where in spite of bona fide enquiries, the Sub Registrar is not able to make out; whether the power of attorney is for consideration--But if on the basis of such power of attorney, an instrument for sale is presented for registration, the Sub Registrar will be competent to hold an enquiry at any subsequent stage into the nature of transaction and to return a finding that such power of attorney was for consideration and, therefore, cannot be made basis for registration of an instrument unless the deficiency in such case made good in accordance with law--Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Building Rules, 1952--Chandigarh (Sale of Sites and Building) Rules 1960--Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Now coming to the present case, the petitioner has obtained Power of Attorneys for consideration, as it is evident that the petitioner has entered into an agreement to sell in respect of 30% and 20% shares--Such power of attorneys executed after 15.11.2007 is for consideration and have to bear, the stamp duty as a conveyance--If such instruments have been so stamped, the Sub Registrar is bound to register the sale deeds else such power of attorneys cannot be acted upon unless the deficiency in the stamp duty is made good in accordance with law--The petitioner or any other attorney holder or the prospective purchaser cannot be permitted to evade the payment of stamp duty under the guise of execution of power of attorney--The present writ petition is disposed of in the manner recorded above. (Para 33)
Mr. Hemant Gupta, J.: - The petitioner has sought quashing of the orders dated 02.09.2009 (Annexure P-10) and 22.09.2009 (Annexure P-11) requiring the original owner to apply for ‘No Objection Certificate’ regarding sale of a house. Originally, a residential house bearing H.No.2059, Sector 21-C, Chandigarh was owned by the following persons as is made out from the conveyance deed dated 20.12.2007 executed in their favour:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/2 share owned by 1/2 share owned by
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Tarlochan Singh, (i) Narinder Singh
(ii) Gurdev Singh, (ii) Gurdeep Singh sons of late
Sardar Arjan Singh
(iii) Devender Singh sons of late (iii) Randhir Kaur w/o late Shri
Sardar Arjan Singh Jaswant Singh s/o late Sardar
(iv) Smt. Ravinder Kaur D/o Arjan Singh
late Sardar Arjan Singh
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Out of the aforesaid co-owners, Tarlochan Singh, Devender Singh and Mrs. Ravinder Kaur executed a registered General Power of Attorney in favour of the petitioner on 15.01.2008 qua their 3/8th share in the aforesaid house. Gurdev Singh appointed the petitioner as his General Power of Attorney qua his 1/8th share in the aforesaid house vide General Power of Attorney dated 04.01.2008, whereas Gurdeep Singh and Narender Singh appointed the petitioner as their registered General Power of Attorney qua their 1/3rd share in the house in question on 15.01.2008. Smt. Randhir Kaur wife of Jaswant Singh also appointed the petitioner as her Power of Attorney qua her 1/6th share on 11.08.2004.
3. The Registration and Other Related Laws (Amendment) Act, 2001 (Parliament Act No.48 of 2001) amended The Registration Act, 1908; The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and The Indian Stamp Act, 1899. Section 11 thereof inserted clause 23A in Schedule I to the Indian Stamp Act. On 15.11.2007, an amendment carried by State of Punjab by enacting the Indian Stamp (Punjab Amendment) Act, 1994 (Punjab Act No.17 of 1994) was extended to Chandigarh. The amendments carried out by Parliament Act No.48 of 2001 and by extension of Punjab Act No.17 of 1994 to Chandigarh would lead to the following as the applicable provisions to Chandigarh:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
48. POWER OF ATTORNEY as Proper stamp duty
defined by Section 2 (21), not
being a proxy (No.52) -
xxx xxx xxx xxx
(f) When given for consideration The same duty as other
and authorising the attorney Conveyance (No.23) as
to sell any immovable levied by this Act for the
property. Amount of consideration.
23. CONVEYANCE as defined by
Section 2(10) not being a where Other
TRANSFER charged or conveyance conveyances
exempted under No.62 - amount to
sale of
immovable
property
xxx xxx xxx xxx
And for every Rs.500 or part Sixty three Fifteen
thereof in excess of RS.1000 Rupees Rupees
(vide Punjab Act No.17 of 1994)
*23. Conveyance,
(a) xxx
(b) for the purpose of this article,
the portion of duty paid in
respect of a document falling
under Article No.23-A shall be
excluded while computing the
duty payable in respect of a
corresponding document relating to
the completion of the transaction
under this article.
*23-A. Conveyance in the Nature Ninety per cent of the duty
of Part Performance – Contracts as a Conveyance (No.23)
for the transfer of immovable
property in the nature of part
performance under Section 53-A
of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882
(*vide Parliament Act No.48 of 2001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Thre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.