Mr. Jaswant Singh, J.: - Plaintiff/appellant is in second appeal against the judgement and decree 29.2.2008 passed by learned District Judge, Faridabad, whereby, while accepting the appeal of defendants/respondents, the judgment and decree dated 31.8.2007 passed by the trial court, partly decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/appellant was set aside and the suit of the plaintiff /appellant was dismissed in toto.

2. Facts necessary for the decision of the present second appeal are that plaintiff/appellant filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of mandatory injunction alleging therein that plaintiff company was incorporated under the Indian Companies Act,1956; having its Corporate office at New Delhi and Works at Palwal, District Faridabad. Telephone connections bearing nos. 53306 and 53873 were installed at Faridabad works in its name. It was further alleged that plaintiff received inflated bill dated 25.6.1996 amounting to Rs.9,07,247/- showing 632437 units/calls for the period w.e.f. 25.9.1992 to 25.6.1996 in respect of telephone connection no. 53306 without mentioning the details of STD/ISD. Vide letter dated 17.7.1996 the plaintiff was also threatened by d