L.N.MITTAL
Sumitra Devi – Appellant
Versus
Ramroop – Respondent
Mr. L.N. Mittal, J.: (Oral) - Legal representatives of Ram Chander original defendant since deceased have filed this second appeal, having lost in both the courts below.
2. Respondent-plaintiff Ramroop filed suit against defendant- Ram Chander for possession of the suit land measuring 2 kanals 16 marlas by specific performance of agreement to sell dated 03.11.2006. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant agreed to sell the suit land to the plaintiff for Rs.1,06,000/- and received Rs.1,05,000/- as earnest money and executed the aforesaid agreement. Sale deed was to be executed on 10.03.2007. The plaintiff went to office of Sub-Registrar on 10.03.2007. However, it was holiday on 10.03.2007 and 11.03.2007 being Saturday and Sunday. Then on 12.03.2007, the plaintiff again went to the office of the Sub-Registrar and remained there from morning till evening for getting the sale deed executed in terms of the agreement but the defendant did not turn up. The plaintiff also served notice on the defendant for executing the sale deed but the defendant refused to receive the notice. The plaintiff claimed that he had always been ready and willing to perform his part of the agreement bu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.