SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 851

MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Hira Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. B.S. Jaswal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. C.S. Brar, DAG Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.: (Oral) - Petitioner Hira Singh son of Nirmal Singh has preferred the instant petition for the grant of regular bail, in a case registered against him alongwith his other co-accused, namely Binder, Jodha, Saba, Babbal, Kaga and Makhi, by means of FIR No.133 dated 9.12.2010 (Annexure P1), on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 148, 307, 323, 324, 325, 326 and 341 read with section 149 IPC by the police of Police Station Banur, District Patiala, invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC.

2. Concisely, the prosecution case is that on 8.12.2010, all the accused armed with swords (kirpans) and iron rods, came at the shop of Hira Singh petitioner, where complainant Gurdip Singh, his brother Harwinder Singh and friend Tanu Sharma were present. They (accused) attacked and caused injuries to the complainant, his brother Harwinder Singh & friend Tanu Sharma, with their respective weapons. According to the prosecution that the petitioner gave single kirpan blow, which landed on the left side of chest of the complainant.

3. Leveling a variety of allegations and narrating the sequence of events, in all, the prosecution







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top