SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 861

L.N.MITTAL
Rohtash Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kalyan Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. L.N. Mittal, J.: (Oral) - C. M. No. 16185-C-II of 2012 :

Allowed as prayed for.

Main Case :

2. Plaintiff no.1 Rohtash Singh has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing order dated 18.05.2012 (Annexure P-2), passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narnaul, thereby allowing application Annexure P-1 moved by Rajesh and Yogesh (respondents no.5 and 6 herein) under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short – CPC) for impleading them as party to the suit, which has been instituted by the petitioner and proforma respondents no.7 to 11 against respondents no.1 to 4 as defendants.

3. Respondents no.5 and 6, in their application Annexure P-1, pleaded that they have purchased the disputed land from defendant-respondent no.4 – Smt. Chander Kala vide sale deed dated 27.12.2007 and it was within the knowledge of the plaintiffs, but still respondents no.5 and 6 herein were not impleaded as party to the suit. They learnt of the pendency of the suit on 21.10.2011, when counsel for plaintiffs disclosed about pendency of the suit in proceedings for correction of khasra girdawari. Thereu







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top