SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 865

L.N.MITTAL
Joginder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Gurmej Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Vikas Behl, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. L.N. Mittal, J.: (Oral) - Plaintiff-Joginder Kaur having non-suited by both the Courts has filed this second appeal.

2. Plaintiff-appellant filed suit against defendant/respondent-Gurmej Singh alleging that plaintiff is owner in possession of the suit plot situated across the road from her house. The suit plot is ancestral property of the plaintiff. She raised foundations of the suit plot upto height of 2 feet. She has been storing her manure and garbage there. Defendant having no right, title or interest therein threatened to dispossess the plaintiff from the suit plot. Plaintiff sought permanent injunction restraining the defendant from doing so.

3. The defendant denied the plaint averments and pleaded that defendant is owner in possession of the suit property and has raised foundations upto plinth level and he is using it for storing manure etc. It is comprised of khasra No.2590/1 to 1554(2-12). Plaintiff herein threatened to take forcible possession of the suit property whereupon defendant herein had filed suit against the plaintiff herein and her son. The present suit is, therefore, liable to be stayed under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

4. Learned Ci








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top