SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 883

L.N.MITTAL
Didar Singh @ Dara Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. S.S. Pathania, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. L.N. Mittal, J.: (Oral) - Judgment debtor Didar Singh alias Dara Singh by filing this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has challenged order dated 8.10.2010, Annexure P/2 passed by the executing court i.e. learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fazilka thereby ordering issuance of conditional arrest warrant against the judgment debtor on application Annexure P/1 moved by respondent decree-holder State Bank of India under section 51 read with Order 21 Rule 37 and section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short, CPC).

2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file.

3. Counsel for the petitioner contended that no notice of application Annexure P/1 was issued to the JD-petitioner nor any opportunity of hearing was given before passing the impugned order which is, therefore, unsustainable.

4. I have carefully considered the aforesaid contention which merits acceptance. Impugned order passed by the executing court is reproduced as under:-

“Present:- Sh. J.P. Dhawan, Branch Manager in person on behalf of DH Bank.

DH has filed an application under section 51 read with Order 2 Rule 37 and Section 151 CPC






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top