L.N.MITTAL
Didar Singh @ Dara Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
Mr. L.N. Mittal, J.: (Oral) - Judgment debtor Didar Singh alias Dara Singh by filing this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has challenged order dated 8.10.2010, Annexure P/2 passed by the executing court i.e. learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fazilka thereby ordering issuance of conditional arrest warrant against the judgment debtor on application Annexure P/1 moved by respondent decree-holder State Bank of India under section 51 read with Order 21 Rule 37 and section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short, CPC).
2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file.
3. Counsel for the petitioner contended that no notice of application Annexure P/1 was issued to the JD-petitioner nor any opportunity of hearing was given before passing the impugned order which is, therefore, unsustainable.
4. I have carefully considered the aforesaid contention which merits acceptance. Impugned order passed by the executing court is reproduced as under:-
“Present:- Sh. J.P. Dhawan, Branch Manager in person on behalf of DH Bank.
DH has filed an application under section 51 read with Order 2 Rule 37 and Section 151 CPC
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.