PARAMJEET SINGH
Vijay Kumar Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Kumar Grover – Respondent
Mr. Paramjeet Singh, J.: - The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the complaint No.879/2 dated 9.9.2009, entitled “Shiv Kumar Grover v. Smt. Sheetal Gaurav P. Jain and another”, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) and the summoning order dated 9.9.2009 (Annexure P-2) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Brief facts as mentioned in the complaint are to the effect that the petitioners/accused approached the complainant-respondent in the month of March 2009 for purchasing copper scrap. The complainant is doing the business of trading/agent of ferrous and non-ferrous scrap and supplying to different persons in India whereas the accused are alleged to be also doing the business of purchasing and selling scrap. It is also mentioned that the complainant-respondent is doing the work of trading/agent only. It is mentioned in the complaint that the complainant-respondent is also an agent of AIP Industries, Office No.2, 5th Floor, Carnival Complex, Mall Road, Ludhiana. The said company is also doing the business of trading of ferrous and non ferrous metals. On 2.3.2009, the complainant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.