A.N.JINDAL
Maneesh Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Brij Bala – Respondent
Mr. A.N. Jindal, J.: - This order shall dispose of two connected revision petitions bearing Nos.4007 of 2012 filed by Maneesh Mittal-husband and 4160 of 2012 filed by Smt. Brij Bala-wife, arising out of the common order and involving the similar questions of law and facts.
2. However, for convenience, the facts are being taken up from Civil Revision No. 4160 of 2012.
3. During the proceedings under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act (for brevity, “the Act”), Smt. Brij Bala-petitioner (herein referred as, ‘the petitioner) moved an application under Section 24 of the Act for seeking maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses for herself as well as her minor child namely Archit Mittal. She claimed that she is unable to maintain herself as well as minor son. Now she is working as Assistant Manager, Kotak Mahindra Bank Chandigarh with effect from February, 2012 and drawing salary of Rs.40,000/- per month. Previously, she was working as Assistant Manager with Deutsche Bank, Ludhiana and was drawing salary of Rs.30,000/- per month. It has been further submitted that Maneesh Mittal-respondent (herein referred as, ‘the respondent’) is working as Senior Vice President in Barc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.