SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 1

RAM CHAND GUPTA
Sushma Devi – Appellant
Versus
Mangat Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.S. Rajput, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Ram Chand Gupta, J.(Oral) - The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure for setting aside order dated 27.08.2008 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rewari in petition no. 24 of 2005, Annexure P3, filed by petitioner-wife for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. as well as order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari in petition no.56 of 2008 titled as ‘Mangat Ram v. Sushma Devi and another’ and in revision petition bearing no. 5 of 2009 titled as ‘Sushma Devi v. Mangat Ram’ filed by petitioner-wife, which were decided on 03.07.2009 vide which learned Chief Judicial Magistrate had granted maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month to petitioner-wife and however, the same was reduced to Rs.4,000/- per month by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned orders.

3. Relationship of husband-wife has not been disputed. There is also no dispute that petitioner-wife is residing separate from respondent-husband. Petitioner is having no income to maintain herself. It is the duty of respondent-husband to





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top