RAM CHAND GUPTA
Fauja Singh – Appellant
Versus
Lallu – Respondent
Mr. Ram Chand Gupta, J.: (Oral) - The present regular second appeal has been filed against judgment and decree dated 2.1.1987 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Hissar, allowing appeal filed by respondent-plaintiff against judgment and decree dated 29.1.1986 passed by learned Additional Senior Sub Judge, Fatehabad, dismissing suit filed by respondent-plaintiff.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the appellants and have gone through the whole record carefully including both the judgments passed by learned Courts below.
3. Briefly stated, respondent-plaintiff filed a suit against present appellants-defendants seeking a decree for possession of land measuring 40 kanals duly described in the plaint. Plea was taken that the land in dispute was allotted to plaintiff by Collector, Hisar, under the East Punjab Utilisation of Lands Act, 1949 (hereinafter to be referred as the ‘Act’) being waste land for a period of 20 years from the year 1971 to the year 1991 subject to payment of Rs.2.50p per acre as rent per annum. He also installed a tubewell in the land in dispute and reclaimed it. However, as crop of kharif for the year 1980 got damaged, he left the said land and we
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.