SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 818

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Hardip Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Applicant-appellant:Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate.
Ms. Harsimrat Rai, DAG Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.: (Oral) - This is second application for suspension of sentence of the applicant-appellant Hardip Singh, who was held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 376, IPC and was awarded rigorous imprisonment for 10 years, besides payment of fine of Rs.2000/-. The recovery of the fine was stayed during pendency of the appeal vide order dated 04.4.2007.

2. Learned counsel contends that out of the maximum awarded sentence of 10 years, the applicant-appellant has suffered incarceration for more than 06 years. He further submits that keeping in view the heavy roster, the appeal is not likely to be heard soon. He further submits that the applicant-appellant is neither involved nor required in any other case. He also submits that if the benefit of suspended sentence is not extended to the applicantappellant, then the very purpose of filing this appeal would be frustrated. In support of his contention, learned counsel for the applicant-appellant has referred to Bhagwan Rama Shinde Gosai & others v. State of Gujarat (1999)4 SCC 421.

3. Learned counsel for the State has filed the custody certificate by way of affidavit of Shri L.S. Jakhar, PPS, Super




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top