SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 943

M.JEYAPAUL
Singh Ram – Appellant
Versus
Gram Panchayat, Village Sitawali – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Mr. Vikram Punia, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. M. Jeyapaul, J.: - CM No. 11515-C of 2011:

1. The sole appellant-plaintiff has died. The application is filed under Order 22 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure to implead his legal representatives.

2. Heard both sides.

3. The application is allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the memorandum of parties.

RSA No. 3999 of 2011:

4. The appellants are the legal representatives of the deceased Hoshiar Singh. Plaintiff Hoshiar Singh (since deceased) filed a suit for declaration that the order of the Assistant Collector I Grade dated 31.8.2001, order dated 31.3.2003 of the Collector, Sonepat, and order dated 24.11.2004 of the Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak, are illegal, null and void and without jurisdiction, and for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plot in dispute.

5. The case of the plaintiff is that he has been in possession of plot No. 247 measuring 217 sq. yards, marked in red colour in the site plan attached with the plaint. The suit property is situate in the abadi Deh of village Sitawali. Plaintiff also has been in possession of the plot in dispute for the last 5







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top