Mr. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.: - The conspectus of the facts, which needs a necessary mention for the limited purpose of deciding the core controversy, involved in the instant petition and emanating from the record, is that the petitioner and other co-owner had purchased the plot, bearing No.49 from the Improvement Trust, Jalandhar, by means of sale deed dated 1.8.1996 (Annexure P2). In pursuance thereof, the mutations (Annexure P3 to P7) were sanctioned on 23.8.1996 in favour of petitioner. It was also claimed that after the death of Surjit Kaur, he had also purchased the share of her son Rajinder Singh, in pursuance of power of attorney (Annexure P8) and sale deed (Annexure P9). Narinder Singh son and Neelam daughter, other heirs of Surjit Kaur, filed the civil suits (Annexure P10 & P13), with regard to the same property, in which, status quo/stay orders (Annexure P11 & P14) were passed. The contempt petition (Annexure P19) was filed for violation of the stay orders. The petitioner has also filed the civil suit (Annexure P20) against Narinder Singh and others. It was alleged that on 29.11.2006 since Ajay Puri tried to trespass into his premises, so, the incident was repor