SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 1590

VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Amar Nath – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Aman Dhir, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Vijender Singh Malik, J.: - Crl. Misc. No.18053 of 2012

The delay of 15 days in filing the revision petition is condoned for the reasons given in the application.

The miscellaneous application is accordingly allowed.

Crl. Revision No.887 of 2012

1. Challenge by way of this revision petition is to the judgment dated 09.11.2011 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib, vide which the judgment of acquittal of respondents no.2 and 3 dated 15.10.2010 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gidderbaha has been upheld, dismissing the appeal preferred by the State of Punjab.

2. Bhim Sain and Manoj Kumar , respondents no.2 and 3 were sent to stand trial for an offence punishable under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 482, 506 and 120-B IPC and section 63 Copyrights Act, 1957 by Police Station Gidderbaha in a case registered by way of FIR No. 105 dated 20.09.2002 on the following allegations of facts.

3. Amar Nath, the complainant is a manufacturer of six photos naswar, a snuff which is quite popular in the country. On account of popularity of his product, many persons were jealous of him. Bhim Sain and Manoj Kumar were selling snuff in duplicate packing of













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top