K. KANNAN J.

1. The landlord is in revision challenging the orders of dismissal of the petition for eviction filed under the Punjab Rent Restrict Act on the ground of personal requirement of the demised property for establishing her own business in Pottery. The petition was filed on an express averment that the petitioner owned no other premises within the same town and she had not also vacated any property to disentitle her for claiming the demised property for personal necessity. The respondent denied that there was any bona fide need and contended that the petitioner was an Architect and she had not established her own prowess or skills in the Pottery business. At the time of trial, it was elicited in the cross examination of the landlord that she had yet another building in her occupation in the very same town and she sought to explain it in her evidence that it was a rented place where she was having an Architect's office and she had no other property in her possession. The Rent Controller observed that the petitioner had been guilty of suppression of material fact and found the bona fides as not established. The Appellate Court had additional reasons to support namely