SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 1477

JASWANT SINGH
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Chander Kala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. D.K. Jangra, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate for respondent no.1.

JUDGMENT

JASWANT SINGH, J.

Appellant/tenant/defendant no.1 Dinesh Kumar is in second appeal against the judgment of reversal, whereby respondent no.1/landlord Chander Kala's suit for ejectment by way of possession of shop no.3 was decreed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bhiwani vide its judgment and decree dated 1.12.2005, thereby reversing the findings returned by learned Additional Civil Judge(Senior Division), Bhiwani vide judgment and decree dated 30.08.2000.

In brief, the facts of the case are that plaintiff had filed a suit for ejectment of the defendants from the shop situated in Bhiwani by alleging that the same was constructed in the year 1989 and was let out to defendants on 3.2.1993 on a monthly rent of Rs.2250/- inclusive of taxes. Since the defendants did not pay rent from 1.12.1994 to 31.10.1996, thus a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act was served upon them for termination of their tenancy. Since the defendants did not vacate the premises, present suit was filed.

Upon notice, joint written statement was filed by both tenants/defendants whereby it was inter alia contended that the suit itself is not maintainable and the civil court has no j












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top