HARNAM SINGH
Jagan Nath – Appellant
Versus
Moti Ram – Respondent
2. Jagan Nath, son of Tarbeni Sahai instituted the suit of which this appeal has arisen on 7-11-1945, for a declaration that the sales set out in the preceding paragraph were effected without consideration and legal necessity and that the sales will not affect his reversionary rights after the death of Tarbeni Sahai alienor. The contesting defts. resisted the suit inter alia on the ground that the suit was barred by time. The trial Ct. granted the pltf. declaration to the effect that the sales in question were without consideration and legal necessity and would not be binding upon his reversionary rights after the death of deft. 1. In the trial Ct., the parties were left to bear their own costs. The contesting defts. then preferred an appeal from the decree passed by the trial Ct. on 21-1-1947. The lower appellate Ct. has allowed the appeal leaving the parties to bear their own costs in th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.