L.N.Mittal
Indusind Bank – Appellant
Versus
Bhullar Transport Company – Respondent
Mr. L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral):- Decree holder Indusind Bank Ltd. has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against order dated 23.8.2010 passed by the executing court i.e. learned Additional District Judge, Amritsar thereby ordering return of execution petition Annexure P/2 filed by the petitioner for enforcement of arbitration award Annexure P/1.
2. Petitioner filed execution petition Annexure P/2 for enforcement of arbitration award Annexure P/1 under section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, the Act).
3. Respondent/judgment debtor no. 1 filed application Annexure P/3 for dismissal of the execution petition alleging that no part of cause of action arose at Amritsar and therefore, the executing court at Amritsar has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the execution petition. In this regard, it was pleaded that the truck chassis (for which loan was taken from the petitioner) was purchased at Jalandhar. The alleged agreement between the parties was also executed at Jalandhar. The DH had also its office at Jalandhar and the first insurance of the vehicle in question was also effected in Jalandhar.
4. Responden
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.