SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 380

L.N.Mittal
Sandeep Jindal – Appellant
Versus
Ram Gir Thakran – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral):- Accused Sandeep Jindal has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short – Cr.P.C.), assailing order dated 06.03.2013 (Annexure P-6), passed by Judicial Magistrate, thereby dismissing application (Annexure P-4), moved by the accused for sending the cheque in question to Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) for determining the age of ink.

2. Respondent-complainant has filed complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 alleging dishonour of the cheque in question issued by petitioner-accused. The petitioner, in application (Annexure P-4), alleged that he along with complainant and his son was carrying on business of property in the year 2006-07. The complainant had issued 3-4 signed cheques, in which the amount had also been filled, but the columns of date and payee’s name were left blank. Complainant subsequently filled the said columns. Accordingly, prayer has been made for sending the cheque to FSL to determine the age of aforesaid writing in the cheque. Complainant, by reply (Annexure P-5), resisted the application. The trial Magistrate, vide order Annexure P-6, has dismissed the said ap






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top