SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 97

Paramjeet Singh
Saroj Bala @ Geeta – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar Kalyan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. P.C. Suman, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. J.S. Saneta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Paramjeet Singh, J.:- Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the “Code”) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging order dated 15.11.2011 (Annexure P/4) passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ambala, whereby order dated 20.09.2010 (Annexure P/1) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambala Cantt. in an application under Section 125 of the Code has been set aside and the application under Section 125 of the Code has been ordered to be dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that marriage between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized on 04.11.1996 according to Hindu Rites and Ceremonies. No issue was born from the marriage. Initially, respondent – Ashok Kumar Kalyan filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). During the pendency of that petition, the parties jointly moved an application under Section 13-B of the Act for grant of decree of divorce by mutual consent. During the course of those proceedings, a compromise was effected between the parties and the statements of the parties were recorded.















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top