Mr. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J. (Oral):- As identical questions of law and facts are involved, therefore, I propose to dispose of the indicated petitions bearing CRM No. M-33292 of 2010 titled Avinash Chawla Vs. Naresh Kumar (for brevity “the 1st case) and CRM No. M-20108 of 2012 titled Sunil Chawla Vs. State of Haryana & another, (for short “the 2nd case”), filed by the different accused, arising out of the same impugned complaint (Annexure P-1), by virtue of this common judgment, in order to avoid the repetition.

2. The crux of the facts and material, culminating in the commencement, relevant for disposal of the instant petitions and emanating from the record is that Avinash Chawla, Shiv Kumar Chawla sons of Sham Das Chawla, Gulshan son of Jagan Nath Chawla and Sushil Kumar Chawla son of Baldev Chawla, claimed themselves to be the co-owner in land in question, situated in village Dungasara, District Guna (Madhya Pradesh). Petitioner-Avinash Chawla had contacted the complainant Naresh Kumar son of late Om Parkash Batra-respondent (for brevity ‘the complainant’), and told that his family members wanted to sell their land. The complainant visited, selected and intended to pu