SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 611

Ritu Bahri
Arjan Singh Kalra – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Dbhavyadeep Walia, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Ms. Shivali, AAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Ms. Ritu Bahri, J. (Oral) - An affidavit of Mr. Davinder Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samana, has been filed in the Court, which is taken on record.

2. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of the order dated 01.06.2013 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patiala, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for permanent exemption from personal appearance, was dismissed.

3. The petitioner is facing trial under Sections 341, 323, 506, 201 34 IPC, which are bailable offences. The case in which the offence triable is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, is to be treated as a “summons case.” As per Section 313 (1) (b) of the Cr.P.C., the personal appearance of the accused can be exempted in the summons case. The said section reads as under:-

313. Power to examine the accused;- (1) In every inquiry or trial, for the purpose of enabling the accused personally to explain any circumstances appearing in the evidence against him, the Court-

(a) may at any stage, without previously warning the accused, put such questions to him as the Court considers necessary;

(b) shall after the witnesses for the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top