Mr. Jaswant Singh, J.: - Petitioners(tenant nos.1,2 & 4 to 7) are in revision against the concurrent findings returned by both the Authorities below whereby the ejectment application filed by the respondents(landlords) on the ground of personal necessity for themselves, cease to occupy the premises since 1992 and the building being unfit and unsafe for human habitation was allowed by the learned Rent Controller, Jalandhar vide his order dated 23.08.2007 and the findings thereof were affirmed by the learned Appellate Authority, Jalandhar vide his order dated 21.12.2012.

2. In brief, facts of the case are that the respondents(landlords) Harbhajan Singh and Harvinder Singh who are brothers, filed an eviction petition against the petitioners(tenants) on the ground that the property in question is required by them as both of them have their respective families and are at present living in a house along with their father which now is not sufficient to accommodate such a big family especially when there is an altercation with the father now. It was also averred that the petitioners (tenants) have ceased to occupy the premises in question since the year 1992 and thus are entitled