Tejinder Singh Dhindsa
Justice Shanti Sarup Dewan (retired) – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh – Respondent
Mr. Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.: - The petitioners are an aged couple residing in House No.642, Sector 11-B, Chandigarh. Such residential property is claimed to be self-acquired at the hands of petitioner No.1. The petitioners have two daughters and a son. Both daughters are married and staying separately at their matrimonial homes. It has been pleaded that on account of nurturing a desire that the son of the petitioners leads an independent life, plot No.694, Sector 6, Panchkula was purchased by petitioner No.1 and thereafter transferred in the name of the son in the year 1990. It is further stated that the son had sold the plot in the year 1991 and from such sale proceeds has purchased plot No.1016, Sector 2, Panchkula in his name and has also raised construction thereupon. However, the son, namely, Suvir Dewan along with his wife and daughter continues to live with the petitioners in the house in Sector 11, Chandigarh.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed invoking the extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for safe-guarding the life and liberty of the petitioners as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitut
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.