IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta AND The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
CRA No.569-DB of 2009
Naveed Masih
v.
State of Punjab
{Decided on 21/10/2013}
(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.2(b)--Police Officer--Empowered Police Officer, invested with police powers under the a Special Act, can file a complaint in terms of S.190 of the Code. (Para 28)
Apart from the police constituted under the Police Act, 1861, certain Officers of specified organizations have been invested powers of an Officer-in-charge of a Police Station. With such conferment of powers, the investigation of the offences can be conducted by the officers, but such power of investigation is under a special Act and not under the Code--After such investigation, which is not any way analogous to the investigation carried out by police under Section 2 (h) of the Code, the empowered Officer can file a complaint in terms of Section 190 of the Code.
(B) Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, S.67--Investigation--Held; Empowered Officers of the NCB under the Act are not the police officers and not are bound to carry investigations under the Act in accordance with Chapter XII of the Code after lodging of an FIR--Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.157. (Para 41)
(C) Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Ss.21 & 23--Possession--Accused can be convicted for both the offences under S.21 & 23 of the Act. (Para 48)
Section 21 of the Act deals with possession of any manufactured drug or any preparation containing any manufactured drug, whereas Section 23 of the Act deals with punishment for illegal import in to India of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. Since, the appellant Naveed Masih was found in possession of manufactured drug and was also importing the same to India, therefore, he is liable to be punished both under Sections 21 & 23 of the Act.
(D) Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, S.21--Confessional Statement--Non examination of Independent witnesses--Held; The recording of confessional statement was by an empowered officer, therefore, such statement can be proved by the officer, who recorded such statement as well as by the witnesses, who were present at the time of recording of such statement--It is not necessary for the complainant to examine each and every witness, when the primary witness, who recorded the statement, has been examined in Court. (Para 47)
Mr. Hemant Gupta, J.:- This order shall dispose of aforementioned three appeals i.e. CRA No.569-DB of 2009; CRA No.318-DB of 2009 & CRA No.251-DB of 2009 preferred by Naveed Masih s/o Sharief Masih; Ajit Singh s/o Tara Singh and Arsal Singh s/o Bhag Singh respectively, against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 17.02.2009 passed by the Special Court, Amritsar, whereby appellant Naveed Masih was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 21 & 23 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 15 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lac each on both counts, whereas appellants Ajit Singh and Arsal Singh were convicted for an offence punishable under Section 29 of the Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 15 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lac each. In the event of default of payment of fine, the defaulter shall further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.
2. The Narcotics Control Bureau (hereinafter referred to as ‘NCB’) filed a complaint in the Court of Special Judge, Amritsar against the present appellants on 22.12.2005 for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 21, 29 & 60 of the Act. In the complaint (Ex.P48), it is pleaded that on 28.06.2005 at about 1.15 AM, when Constable Satpal Singh - PW4 and Constable Kailash Chand were on duty at naka No.85 of Border Out Post (BOP) Dharma of ‘B’ coy Papa-I Battalion of Border Security Force, they observed some movement approximately 100 meters ahead of fence near Border pillar 37/8. Constable Satpal Singh alerted Constable Hiralal Yadav and informed post Commander SIO R.D.Parsad, who was on command naka. At the same time, message was also conveyed to Sh. Shyam Kumar, AC Coy Commander ‘B’ Coy Papa-I BN - PW5, who had just arrived from depth patrolling in the AOR Dharma KS Wala and Wan. He also rushed to the spot. In the meantime, the naka party ordered the intruders to surrender and come forward. The intruders stood still for a while, but the man standing behind ran towards international border and escaped by taking advantage of darkness, bushes and broken ground. On reaching at the spot, Company Commander took the other intruder on gun point and sent guard party to bring the intruder to own side through gate No.137. Four rounds were fired from Pakistan side and in retaliation; the troops fired 11 rounds of BDR. When the fire stopped, the party during search recovered one cloth packet containing four bundles packing tape wrapped around each packet having a characteristic pungent smell. It was revealed by Pakistani intruder that it was heroin. During search of the intruder, one mobile phone (Nokia), 100 rupees Pakistani currency, telephone diary and visiting cards were recovered. A memo Ex.P4 of recoveries of articles recovered along with the list of persons involved in the operation was prepared. Intimation with regard to capture of Pakistani intruder along with articles recovered was sent to the Commandant, BSF Ex.P3 and NCB for further action, as BSF authorities being not authorized under the provisions of the Act to conduct further action or investigation. Information to superior officers by way of Ex.P1 was also sent. On receipt of information, an investigating team was constituted. On reaching Wan, a request letter signed by O.P.Sharma, Superintendent NCB, was moved to the Commandant with regard to handing over of Pakistani intruder along with articles recovered from him. In pursuance of such letter, BSF officials handed over the said person along with articles recovered by way of Ex.P2, brief profile of the encounter and the list of the officers, who participated in the said encounter. The Investigating Officer of NCB – PW2 prepared recovery memo Ex.P12.
3. At about 8.00 AM on the same day, the officials of the NCB started their investigation after joining two witnesses namely PW Vikram
Bhagwan Singh v. State of Punjab
Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan & Anr.
Nirmal Pehalwan v. Inspector, Customs
Pavunny v. Assistant Collector
Raj Kumar Karwal v. Union of India
Ramesh Chandra Mehta v. The State of W.B.
State of Gujarat v. Anirudhsing
The State of Punjab v. Barkat Ram
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.