SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 932

Jaswant Singh
Sunita Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Kumar Goyal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Mohinder Singh Joshi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Jaswant Singh, J. (Oral):- Since there is delay of 148 days in filing the revision petition, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act bearing CM No.22162-CII/2013 has been filed seeking condonation of said delay. The application is supported by an affidavit of one of the petitioners.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, duly supported by the affidavit, the cause shown is sufficient. Hence application is allowed and delay of 148 days in filing the present revision petition is condoned.

3. Main Case.

The landladies are aggrieved against the order dated 4.3.2013 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Chandigarh whereby provisional rent for the demised premises has been assessed payable w.e.f. 1.9.2011 @ Rs.8266/- per month.

4. It is contended that in the rent agreement dated 1.1.2007 (P1), the relevant clause provided an increase of 7% every year and the learned Rent Controller has not taken into account the said clause while fixing the assessed rate. It is further argued that the lease deed of a similar premises (P4) shows that the prevalent market rent is Rs.55,000/- per month and therefore, the prevalent rent assessed is on lower side.

5. After hea



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top