IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HEMANT GUPTA, FATEH DEEP SINGH, JJ.
State of Punjab - Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Singh - Respondent
CRM No.18934 of 2013 in MRC No.8 of 2007
Date of Order: 21.08.2013
Medical Evidence - Video Conferencing - Section 482 Cr.P.C. and/ or Section 151 CPC and Under Article 226 of the Constitution - [Section 482 Cr.P.C., Section 151 CPC, Article 226 of the Constitution] - The court issued directions to facilitate the recording of medical evidence through video conferencing, including setting up video conferencing rooms in civil hospitals, disclosing the contact details of medical experts, forwarding documents to be proved, and organizing video conferencing for recording statements.
Fact of the Case:
The court addressed the issue of recording medical evidence through video conferencing and issued directions to facilitate the process.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that setting up video conferencing facilities in civil hospitals and implementing procedures for recording medical evidence through video conferencing would be beneficial.
Issues: The issue was to ensure the accurate and efficient recording of medical evidence through video conferencing.
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to issue specific directions to the state government and other parties involved to facilitate the recording of medical evidence through video conferencing.
Final Decision: The court issued detailed directions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and/ or Section 151 CPC and Under Article 226 of the Constitution to facilitate the recording of medical evidence through video conferencing, and disposed of the matter.
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
1. A Division Bench of this Court, while deciding Murder Reference No.8 of 2007 titled “State of Punjab Vs. Mohinder Singh”, noticing spelling mistakes in the medical evidence given by the Doctors, gave the following directions:
“In view of the aforesaid, in order to ensure that medical evidence is placed on Court records in correct and clear terms and also that Presiding Officers of Courts do not take it lightly, we direct the Registrar (Judicial) to issue instructions to Secretaries (Health) and Director General/Directors (Health Services), and Presiding Officers of Courts in Punjab, Haryana and U.T. Chandigarh, that at the time of recording of evidence of Doctors, who are produced as expert witnesses, Courts shall ask them (Medical Doctors etc.) to submit medical reports on affidavit in clear terms with correct spelling.”
2. In pursuance of above directions, the Registrar (Rules) has issued a communication dated 28.08.2008 to the effect that requisite affidavits are required to be prepared by the Doctors, who appear as expert witnesses, as the original records always remain with them, which they can use/refer to, while preparing their affidavits.
3. In a meeting of the Monitoring Committee of this Court with the Officers of Punjab and Chandigarh on 16.04.2012 and with the Officers of Haryana on 17.04.2012 consisting of the Chief Secretary and the Home Secretary of the respective States, it was decided that medical evidence shall be recorded through ‘Video Conferencing’. At that stage, it was pointed out that the Doctors faced difficulties in tendering their evidence on affidavits.
4. Thereafter, vide note dated 24.04.2012, it was suggested by one of us (Hemant Gupta, J.) that the directions issued by the Division Bench earlier on 30.05.2008 are required to be reconsidered by a Bench on judicial side. It is, in pursuance of such note, the matter has been placed before this Bench.
5. In response to the notice issued to the States of Punjab, the Deputy Secretary, Government of Punjab, Department of Home Affairs & Justice, has referred to the meeting held on 16.04.2012, wherein the Principal Secretary, Health & Family Welfare was requested to issue necessary instructions to all the Medical Officers to record their evidence through Video Conferencing. In pursuance thereof, the Department of Health & Family Welfare has issued a circular on 02.07.2013 directing the Medical Officers, who appear as witness, to record their evidence through Video Conferencing and that concerned Doctor should reach the NIC Centres situated at District Headquarters or prisons premises to record their evidence through video conferencing.
6. It has also come on record that in the State of Punjab 32 Court sites in Phase – I and 23 Court sites in Phase – II have been provided with Video Conferencing facility. The Courts in Gurdaspur, Batala & Pathankot, have not provided with Video Conferencing facility so far, in the State of Punjab.
7. On the other hand, in an affidavit filed by the Additional Secretary to Government of Haryana, Administration of Justice Department, reference is made to the circular issued by the Director General Health Services, Haryana on 13.07.2012 for recording of the evidence of the Medical Experts through Video Conferencing.
8. At the time of hearing, Ms. Shubhra Singh has produced on record communication dated 12.08.2013 pointing out that the testimonies of Judicial Magistrates, Doctors and Experts have been recorded through Video Conferencing and that no difficulty has been reported by any Public Prosecutor while recording the statements of the witnesses through Video Conferencing.
9. Similarly, Ms. Aashima Mor, learned counsel representing the Chandigarh Administration, referred to the meeting of the Doctors of Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Chandigarh; Government Medical College & Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh and Government Multi-Specialty Hospital, Sector 16, Chandigarh held
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.