K. Kannan, J (oral).

1. The petition for amendment of rent petition for eviction was dismissed by the Appellate Court and the revision petitioner is aggrieved by the order of dismissal on the ground that the amendment become necessary only on the fact of subsequent event and hence it ought not to have been dismissed.

2. The petition for eviction among other grounds was for personal necessity of the landlord and the wife of petitioner No.1 had a contention to make that he was intending to start a professional coaching centre at the demised property. He would explain the need by saying that his own children were studying in professional course and the costs of education were high. He had to augment his income by putting his own knowledge to appropriate use. He explained his own ability in teaching with the assistance of his daughter-in-law who was also very highly qualified and the type of user that he intended to make at the demised premises, after securing eviction.

3. It appears that the petition had been filed for amendment before the Rent Controller taking a calculation that the first petitioner had died and the property was necessary also for the needs of the sons and g