RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Raghu Nath – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak – Respondent
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J.
The petitioners have challenged the orders dated 8.10.2009 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Commissioner, Rohtak Division, upholding the order dated 10.4.2006 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Collector Sonepat and the order dated 2.12.2003 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Ganaur, alleging that impugned orders have been passed in glaring violation of the mode of partition dated 7.7.2003 (Annexure P-7).
The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners, vide their application dated 7.8.1996, sought partition of land measuring 161 kanals 10 marlas, amongst its co-sharers. After hearing both the parties, mode of partition was proposed vide order dated 8.11.2001 (Annexure P-6), inviting objections from the parties. Objections were heard and finally, the mode of partition was amended vide order dated 7.7.2003 (Annexure P-7). Pursuant to the amended mode of partition dated 7.7.2003, Assistant Collector 1st Grade, sought naksha kha. The petitioners filed their objections dated 19.9.2003 (Annexure P-8) to the naksha kha. However, Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Ganaur, vide his order dated 2.12.2003 (Annexure P-1), accepted the naksha K
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.