SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 12

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Nirmal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. D.S. Rawat, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Aman Bahri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.:- The petitioners raise a challenge to the seniority list dated 26.03.2013 (Annexure P-5) of the Assistant Directors under the Department of Animal Husbandry, Fisheries and Dairy Development Punjab, wherein they have been shown junior to private respondent No.4.

2. Undisputed facts are that the petitioners who all belong to the general category were initially appointed as Fishery Officers on 28.09.1978, 28.09.1978 and 13.02.1980 respectively. Respondent No.4 who belongs to the scheduled castes category was appointed subsequently as Fishery Officer on 23.06.1980. However, by enjoying the benefit of reservation, respondent No.4 earned promotion as Senior Fishery Officer on 22.09.1987 and was further granted promotion as Assistant Director on 10.09.1990. In comparison the petitioners earned promotions as per their turn as Senior Fishery Officer on 19.12.1990, 15.10.1991 and 01.01.1992 respectively and thereafter were promoted as Assistant Directors vide order dated 29.07.2005.

3. A tentative seniority list of Assistant Directors was circulated on 16.11.2007 in which the petitioners were shown at seniority Nos.10, 14 and 15 respectively whereas r












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top